World · United States of America
James Comey faces third criminal case over alleged national defence disclosures
Federal prosecutors have brought two counts against the former FBI director in Washington DC. His lawyers say the alleged disclosure was investigated twice without charges and argue that the prosecution deadline has passed.
Comey faces a third prosecution effort, this time over alleged national defence disclosures. His lawyers challenge the case's timing and cite previous investigations.
- Two disclosure counts were filed in Washington DC.
- Comey denies wrongdoing.
- Lawyers say earlier investigations ended without charges.
- The separate seashell-image case remains ongoing.
What's new
- The Justice Department has filed two national defence disclosure counts against Comey.
- Instead of obtaining an indictment from a grand jury, prosecutors filed the charges by criminal information.
- Comey's lawyers say earlier investigations concluded that charges were unwarranted.
The US Justice Department has brought two counts alleging disclosure of national defence information against former FBI director James Comey in federal court in Washington DC, according to reports on October 26, 2026. The filing marks its third effort to prosecute him, and Comey denies wrongdoing.21
Allegations linked to a 2016 article
The government alleges that Comey disclosed information in 2016 and worked with an unidentified person to pass it to a national news organisation, according to the Guardian. The Straits Times reported that he is accused of directing an unnamed individual to give national defence information to a reporter.23
Comey's lawyer, Patrick Fitzgerald, said the case concerns a New York Times article published on October 5, 2016. According to the BBC, Comey's legal team described the underlying allegation as a disclosure of classified information to the newspaper that October.21
Prosecutors brought the case through a criminal information, rather than an indictment approved by a grand jury. The Guardian reported that prosecutors would eventually need grand-jury approval for the charges. That procedural step remains separate from the defence's objections to pursuing the case.124
Defence challenges the prosecution
Comey's lawyers argue that the statute of limitations has expired and that the allegations have already been examined twice without charges, according to the Guardian. Fitzgerald said two prosecution teams had previously concluded that no prosecution should follow, the BBC reported.21
Fitzgerald said investigators considered the matter during Trump's first administration, according to the Straits Times. He said “the government determined that no charges should be brought against anyone”. Comey separately denied wrongdoing in a video posted on Substack, the BBC reported.31
Two earlier cases
In September 2025, Comey faced charges of lying to Congress and impeding a congressional proceeding. He pleaded not guilty, according to the BBC. That case was dismissed after a judge found that the prosecutor who brought it had been unlawfully appointed, the Guardian and Straits Times reported.123
A separate prosecution concerns an Instagram photograph of seashells arranged as the numbers 86 and 47. According to the BBC, Comey surrendered in April 2026 over allegations that the image threatened Trump's life. Prosecutors allege it encouraged violence; Comey says he did not understand the numbers' meaning and alleges political motivation. The BBC reported that this second case remains ongoing.13
Why it matters
For European readers following US institutions, the case brings together the handling of national defence information and a dispute over the prosecution of a former FBI director. The earlier congressional case ended over the prosecutor's appointment, while Comey's lawyers challenge the latest case on timing and prior investigative decisions.123
Videos
Related stories
Version history
- version 1 ·
