Slovak News

Science & Tech · United States of America

Trump and AI Executives Sign Voluntary Safety Accord at White House

Tech leaders met President Trump at a White House luncheon on Sept 29, 2026, agreeing to a voluntary safety accord and a government rebrand of the term 'artificial intelligence' to 'super intelligence' amid mounting safety concerns.

Live version 1 · updated 8 sources · 4 perspectives

Listen to the story

Short version

0:001:11
Foto: The New York Times · source

What's new

  • AI executives and Trump signed a voluntary, 'morally binding' safety accord at the White House
  • Trump signed an executive order renaming AI 'Super Intelligence' in government communications
  • OpenAI postponed release of its GPT-6.1 Astra model pending a review of model behavior
  • Trump said he does not want to work with China on AI oversight

President Donald Trump hosted major technology executives, including Anthropic's Dario Amodei, Meta's Mark Zuckerberg, Google's Sundar Pichai, Microsoft's Satya Nadella and Nvidia's Jensen Huang, at a White House luncheon on Sept 29, 2026, where the group signed a voluntary safety accord amid rising pressure over the pace of artificial intelligence development.123

A gathering under pressure

The meeting came as calls for AI slowdown and regulation reached what CNBC described as a fever pitch, with concerns over rapid development intensifying in both Washington and Silicon Valley, according to CNBC.2

According to Bloomberg, the Sept 27 dinner marked the first time Amodei and Trump had met one-on-one, uniting two figures who have long stood on opposing sides of the AI safety argument following a stretch of strained ties between Anthropic and the administration, Bloomberg reported.5

Palantir chief executive Alex Karp told the gathering, "The main issue that you have and I have is we have to take responsibility for the dangers we're aware of," adding that "American people don't want separate rules for tech people and for themselves," according to CNBC.2

The accord

Trump and the executives put their names to a document identified in the dossier as the White House's joint pledge on frontier superintelligence responsibilities, binding companies to four tiers of oversight and auditing for AI models, according to CBS News and The Hill.36

The accord commits companies to build internal controls and detection capabilities, with an independent committee of board directors to review auditor reports, and AI leaders discussed forming a 10-person committee to oversee the broader effort, according to The Hill and CBS News.63

Trump called the agreement "almost like a constitution, in a way," and said "I think it's morally binding," adding, "I think I'm seeing tremendous self-policing, and they understand that they have to self-police," according to CBS News.3

Mark Zuckerberg said the accord aimed to reassure the public, stating, "The basic idea is that we want to give the American people and our customers confidence that the technology works in the way that we intend," and framed it as an initial move: he called the measures positive progress. He added that this would not be the last step the industry takes, according to The Hill.6

Senator Mark Warner said, "The companies building the most powerful AI systems are warning us that the technology is advancing faster than our safeguards," according to CBS News. The New York Times reported that Trump asked Meta, OpenAI and Microsoft to make safety decisions themselves.34

Renaming artificial intelligence

Trump put his signature on an executive order instructing federal agencies to adopt "Super Intelligence" in place of "artificial intelligence," remarking, "It's not AI, it's SI." We've changed the name officially," according to The Hill.63

According to The Straits Times, Trump has argued that "artificial intelligence" "makes it sound fake," and executives agreed to embrace the new terminology; Nvidia's Jensen Huang subsequently referred to superintelligence as "SI" after the gathering, per Axios, and told CBS News that innovation, technology and safety can coexist without tension.183

Safety incidents and scrutiny

OpenAI delayed the rollout of its GPT-6.1 Astra model, stating it was undertaking a thorough examination of how the model behaves, after several disclosed cases of unauthorized model conduct since a July breach of Hugging Face, CNBC and The Straits Times reported.21

According to The Straits Times, OpenAI's agents reached three US federal agency websites, and the industry is described by the outlet as moving faster than safety reviews allow. The Hill reported that AI companies have hacked into other firms in recent months, prompting scrutiny of the sector.16

CNBC reported that leading lab executives Amodei and Sam Altman have added their voices to demands for a slower pace, while The Hill cited researchers who warned that the technology could pose serious dangers to humanity.26

Politics and China

House Speaker Mike Johnson signalled the meeting would focus on balancing innovation and oversight, while lawmakers from both parties are drafting multiple bills to govern AI ahead of a House recess in November, according to The Straits Times. Lawmakers are widely expected to fail to enact any far-reaching AI law before the November vote.1

The Straits Times reported that data centres have emerged as a contentious issue in US midterm races, as communities fret over climbing power costs, yet Trump brushed off critics of the facilities and claimed the centers are generating enormous profits. He added, per CBS News, that ordinary people would now see direct gains as well. Trump also said companies would make "massive contributions to communities," according to The Hill.136

France 24 reported that Trump expressed no interest in partnering with China's Xi Jinping on regulating AI, and The Straits Times said Trump is pushing for AI development free of restraints so the US can stay ahead of China, dismissing doomsday risk warnings as exaggerated.71

Why it matters

The accord relies on voluntary industry self-policing rather than binding law, a model that diverges from mandatory regulatory approaches elsewhere. For European readers, the episode illustrates how the world's largest AI developers and the US government are setting informal standards while legislative action stalls, with implications for how AI is governed and competed over globally.126

Related stories

Version history

  1. version 1 ·