SlovakNews

World · Greece, Spain

Greece seeks EU asylum suspension mechanism for migration emergencies

Athens says existing EU rules are inadequate for sudden mass arrivals. The European Commission is preparing an emergency response proposal as governments also pursue return hubs outside the bloc.

Live Version: 1Sources: 3Perspectives: 2Updated:
Foto: Politico Europe · source

What's new

  • Greece proposed pausing asylum applications during major migration emergencies.
  • The Commission is preparing a framework for sudden mass arrivals.
  • EU ministers approved rules permitting return hubs outside the bloc.
  • The scope of EU and national emergency powers remains unresolved.

Greece proposed an EU mechanism to suspend asylum applications temporarily during major migration emergencies, a plan reported on Oct. 2 as interior ministers met in Luxembourg to discuss tighter border controls and undocumented migration into the 27-member bloc, according to Deutsche Welle. The initiative follows a July surge in arrivals in Ceuta, Spain’s North African territory.12

An emergency exception

Athens argues that the EU’s existing framework cannot adequately manage arrivals on the scale recorded in Ceuta. Greek Migration Minister Thanos Plevris said the EU migration pact had reduced arrivals and increased returns but was insufficient in emergencies. He advocated stronger monitoring at the border alongside a temporary halt to asylum processing in such cases.12

Politico reported that ministers from Germany and Austria appeared receptive to the proposal, while officials representing three other member states deferred judgment until the Commission unveils its plan. Sweden’s migration minister, Johan Forssell, supported discussing emergency tools but raised the unresolved question of whether authority should rest with the EU or individual governments.13

The legal and rights implications are central to the debate. Deutsche Welle noted that the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights protects the right to seek asylum. Politico reported that the proposed emergency approach could lead in practice to large-scale pushbacks, which are prohibited under international law, while officials were considering how emergency action could operate without breaching rights.13

Ceuta drives the debate

Spanish authorities estimate that Ceuta received over 72,000 migrant arrivals toward the end of July. Most subsequently returned, but about 10,000 remained in the territory. According to the Spanish government, only minors and small groups among those who entered were transferred to mainland Spain.12

Austrian Interior Minister Gerhard Karner argued that existing regulations were not designed for a single-day arrival of 70,000 people, most of them young men. Plevris cited the Ceuta surge when calling for emergency powers. The Straits Times also reported that boats carrying migrants from Libya to Greek Aegean islands had increased in recent years.23

Greece has previously taken national measures affecting asylum and deportation. According to The Straits Times, it stopped processing applications from North African migrants arriving by sea for several months last year and passed legislation intended to accelerate the deportation of rejected asylum seekers.2

Commission plan and return hubs

The European Commission is expected to put forward an emergency tool for countries facing mass migration movements, although its details are still under development. Migration Commissioner Magnus Brunner presented plans aimed at sudden mass arrivals, including a larger role for the EU border agency Frontex. Politico reported that the framework would also address movements that other countries may deliberately engineer or use as leverage.13

Separately, ministers approved a regulation allowing member states to create return hubs outside the EU, according to Deutsche Welle. Such facilities are intended for people legally required to leave the bloc who cannot be sent to their countries of origin. Supporters contend that the hubs could increase returns and discourage irregular migration, while critics question their legality and warn of risks to fundamental rights.1

The Straits Times reported that the Group of Five—comprising Greece, Germany, Austria, Denmark and the Netherlands—had settled on concrete measures for developing a hub beyond EU territory. A Dutch technical mission visited a possible host country in September, and Deutsche Welle reported that an initial agreement could be reached by year’s end. Politico said Spain opposed the return-hub reform, Belgium abstained, and Ireland and Denmark did not vote because of their opt-out from EU justice matters.123

Why it matters

The proposal would affect how EU countries balance border management with access to asylum during sudden large-scale arrivals. It also sits alongside efforts to move some deportation procedures outside the bloc and follows earlier Greek restrictions on processing applications from North African sea arrivals.123

Version history

  1. version 1 ·