SlovakNews

Climate · United States of America

Trump announces rollback of US methane rules for oil and gas

The proposed changes would reduce oversight of smaller wells and relax flaring restrictions. Trump and the EPA cite US$45 billion in savings, without a detailed agency breakdown.

Live Version: 1Sources: 5Perspectives: 3Updated:

Listen to the story

Short version

0:000:46
Tap to zoom, Esc to close
Foto: AFP · source

What's new

  • Trump announced that his administration was ending Biden-era methane restrictions.
  • Proposed changes would remove the Super Emitter Programme and ease regulation of marginal wells.
  • The EPA cited US$45 billion in savings without detailing its calculation.

US President Donald Trump announced a rollback of methane restrictions on oil and gas producers at a rally in Lubbock, Texas, according to reports published on October 28, 2026. He said his administration was terminating rules introduced under Joe Biden, while the Environmental Protection Agency outlined proposed regulatory changes.1234

Infographic

Trump announces rollback of US methane rules for oil and gas. Sources: The Guardian, AFP, The Straits Times and others. US methane rules. Lubbock. March 2025. Zeldin announces review of Biden-Harris rules. reported 28 Oct. Trump announces rollback at Lubbock rally. Proposals would eliminate Super Emitter Programme. US$45 billion. EPA projected savings; no detailed breakdown. at least 38. EPA industry meetings in administration’s first year
Built from the article's facts; every word on it is checked.

Savings claim accompanies proposed changes

Trump made the announcement while supporting Texas attorney-general Ken Paxton’s Senate campaign. He said scrapping the rules would deliver US$45 billion in combined savings for energy producers and consumers while increasing the supply of natural gas from Texas. The EPA gave the same savings estimate but did not provide a detailed breakdown.234

EPA administrator Lee Zeldin defended reducing requirements on producers, arguing that regulatory burdens made household heating and travel to work less affordable. His argument linked the changes to consumers’ energy costs; the agency’s statement did not set out how the projected savings would be divided between producers and consumers.234

The proposed revisions would eliminate the Super Emitter Programme, weaken regulation of marginal wells and relax restrictions on routine flaring of gas produced alongside oil. Marginal wells are defined as producing no more than 15 barrels of oil equivalent daily. Associated Press also reported that requirements for smaller wells would be eased.2345

In the Permian Basin, operators often burn associated gas because capturing it costs more than the gas would fetch on the market. The proposed relaxation of flaring rules concerns this practice, alongside changes affecting methane leaks and oversight of oil and gas facilities.1234

Climate implications and criticism

Methane is the principal constituent of natural gas and ranks behind carbon dioxide as a cause of global warming. It accounts for roughly one-third of the heating since the pre-industrial era, or about 0.5C. Methane remains in the atmosphere for seven to 12 years, compared with hundreds of years for carbon dioxide.234

Oil and gas operations release methane throughout the production and supply process, from extraction to distribution. The United States has the largest methane emissions from this sector, followed by Russia. Julia Kane, a researcher at the watchdog Fieldnotes, criticised the changes, alleging that they would leave an ineffective standard while companies continued leaking and flaring gas.234

According to the Guardian, the 2024 rule was the first nationwide federal requirement limiting methane from existing oil and gas facilities. The newspaper reported that the EPA announced in March 2025 that it would reconsider the regulations and would no longer enforce oil and gas rules. It also reported at least 38 meetings between the agency and industry representatives during the administration’s first year.1

Why it matters

For European readers, the significance is the contribution of US oil and gas emissions to planetary warming. The United States leads the sector’s methane emissions, and methane accounts for about one-third of warming since the pre-industrial era.234

Related stories

Version history

  1. version 1 ·